There is one loose paper following sheet 1. Here it is
| Supplementary – 59/14 |
| Parish of Greystead, Northumberland |
| Remarks Replies |
| Namelist, page 1 – Examination trace 2 |
| All the documents agree in |
| Snapeend Ford |
| Is this spelling correct or |
| should it be |
| Snape-end Ford |
| Snape End Ford Snape End Ford |
| Snapend Ford is the correct mode |
| "I think the two Es are not of writing it. Name |
| correct – placed together they would Book and Trace |
| require to be written eë if they altered accordingly. |
| are sounded separately and this |
| would be a very unusual mode |
| of writing such a name. |
| H. Helsham Jones |
| Capt. RE |
| P.S. Is it not usual to give some Yes – it is customary |
| description of the persons cited as to do so. the omission |
| authorities? This I observe has only is attributable to the |
| been done in a few cases in this book. inexperience of the |
| H.H.J. Examiner in one |
| instance. in others |
| 59/14 Plan altered [Name?] it has been entered |
| 25 Feb 1864 once and not repeated |
| [AW Lackem?] where the same individual |
| is quoted as an authority. |
| Lieut. Sitwell C. Carey Captn Jones |
| Royal Engineers Captn RE REngrs |
| Namelist for the parish – and traces of |
| 59/14 accompany these remarks. |
| [Signature below applies to main p. 1, not to this loose paper] |
| John Stewart 2nd Corporal Royal Engineers |
Abbreviations are underlined like this RE and the expansion may be seen by hovering the cursor over the abbreviation.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering the cursor over it. |
Transcribed by ARJC